Microsoft Will Shut Down Book Search Program
Posted: 31 May 2008 02:05 PM     [ Ignore ]  
I'm A Regular
Total Posts:  527
Joined  2008-05-31

Microsoft said Friday that it was ending a project to scan millions of books and scholarly articles and make them available on the Web, a sign that it is retrenching in some areas of Internet search in the face of competition from Google, the industry leader.

The announcement, made on a company blog, comes two days after Microsoft said it would focus its Internet search efforts on certain areas where it sees an opportunity to compete against Google. On Wednesday, Microsoft unveiled a program offering rebates to users who buy items that they find using the company?s search engine.

Some search experts said Microsoft?s decision to end its book-scanning effort suggested that the company, whose search engine has lagged far behind those of Google and Yahoo, was giving up on efforts to be comprehensive.

?It makes you wonder what else is likely to go,? said Danny Sullivan, editor in chief of the blog Search Engine Land. ?One of the reasons people turn to Google is that it tries to be a search player in all aspects of search.?

Mr. Sullivan said that the number of people using book search services from Microsoft and Google was relatively small, but it included librarians, researchers and other so-called early adopters who often influence others. These users are now likely to turn to Google with increasing frequency, he said.

Both Microsoft and Google have been scanning older books that have fallen into the public domain, as well as copyright-protected books under agreements with some publishers. Google also scans copyrighted works without permission so it can show short excerpts to searchers, an approach that has drawn fire from publishers.

Microsoft?s decision also leaves the Internet Archive, the nonprofit digital archive that was paid by Microsoft to scan books, looking for new sources of support. Several major libraries said that they had chosen to work with the Internet Archive rather than with Google, because of restrictions Google placed on the use of the new digital files.

?We?re disappointed,? said Brewster Kahle, chairman of the Internet Archive. Mr. Kahle said, however, that his organization recognized that the project, which has been scanning about 1,000 books each day, would not receive corporate support indefinitely. Mr. Kahle said that Microsoft was reducing its support slowly and that the Internet Archive had enough money to keep the project ?going for a while.?

?Eventually funding will come from the public sphere,? Mr. Kahle said.

Some libraries that work with the Internet Archive and Microsoft also said they planned to continue their book-scanning projects.

?We certainly expect to go on with this,? said Carole Moore, chief librarian at the University of Toronto. ?Corporate sponsors are interested in whatever works for their commercial interests and their shareholders. Long-term preservation is not something you can look to the commercial sector to provide. It is what research libraries have always done.?

Microsoft acknowledged on its blog that commercial considerations played a part in its decision to end the program.

?Given the evolution of the Web and our strategy, we believe the next generation of search is about the development of an underlying, sustainable business model for the search engine, consumer and content partner,? Satya Nadella, Microsoft?s senior vice president for search, portal and advertising, wrote on the blog.

Microsoft said it had digitized 750,000 books and indexed 80 million journal articles.

Google, which works with libraries like the New York Public Library and those at Harvard, Stanford, the University of Michigan and Oxford, said it had scanned more than a million books. It plans to scan 15 million in the next decade. Google makes the books it scans freely available through its search engine but does not allow other search engines to use its database.

?We are extremely committed to Google Book Search, Google Scholar and other initiatives to bring more content online,? said Adam Smith, product management director at Google.

Profile
 
Posted: 31 May 2008 02:49 PM   [ # 1 ]     [ Ignore ]   [ # 1 ]  
In The Club
Total Posts:  415
Joined  2008-05-31

I was really disappointed to read about this a few days ago.  I happen to like the UI around their Live Search Books program—I thought it was very clean and crisp and easy to use.  One of the main reasons I am disappointed though is that without serious money being poured into a competitor to Google’s Book Search service, I feel this area will not expand as quickly online.  Does anyone know of any other similar services or projects being undergone as this point in time to compete against Google in this field?

Profile
 
Posted: 31 May 2008 03:04 PM   [ # 2 ]     [ Ignore ]   [ # 2 ]  
In The Club
Total Posts:  221
Joined  2008-05-31

Google has always been my friend. Never used any book-scanning feature though. Windows Live search sucks, I’ve never found anything useful on the first try that Google popped up with.
And will you PLEASE cite your sources, otherwise there’s that little something called “plagarizing” that’s actually not against the rules to report 😉

Profile
 
Posted: 31 May 2008 03:56 PM   [ # 3 ]     [ Ignore ]   [ # 3 ]  
In The Club
Total Posts:  119
Joined  2008-05-30

This is actually from last friday, May 24.  For anyone who wants to know, this news article can be viewed at the following URL:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/24/technology/24soft.html

I’ve tried Google Booksearch and found it very useful.  I was able to find a book that I was planning on purchasing and got to read some pages on there.  I wish Microsoft did compete with them to make a better service.  It would be useful having two book search engines to search through.  What you can’t find in one search engine, you could find in another!

Profile
 
Posted: 31 May 2008 04:00 PM   [ # 4 ]     [ Ignore ]   [ # 4 ]  
In The Club
Total Posts:  125
Joined  2008-05-24

@ skyfuser and shan gee - thanks for the tips.
I myself am loyal to google, though I have never used the book search tool (didn’t know it was there, never thought to look up a book online)
I will keep an eye out for it should I be in the market for a new book.

However, I still like going to the store and browsing. sometimes technology takes away some of the fun of doing certain things, not to mention makes us somewhat lazy and dependent on it.

Profile
 
Posted: 31 May 2008 11:49 PM   [ # 5 ]     [ Ignore ]   [ # 5 ]  
I'm A Regular
Total Posts:  673
Joined  2008-05-31

yep i is a loyal follower of google too
couldnt live without it
though i dont ever read books….
anyway its sad to hear that microsoft is actually giving up on something

Profile
 
Posted: 01 June 2008 02:40 AM   [ # 6 ]     [ Ignore ]   [ # 6 ]  
I'm A Regular
Total Posts:  527
Joined  2008-05-31

I can’t live even a single day without Google.But i’ve noticed that sometimes Gmail & Google search aren’t opening.Is this common tou you all or it’s only for me ?

Profile
 
Posted: 01 June 2008 02:58 AM   [ # 7 ]     [ Ignore ]   [ # 7 ]  
I'm A Regular
Total Posts:  673
Joined  2008-05-31

well strangley my brother, sister, and i have all contracted a virus that iv linked to the disabling of google searches :\
i cant find the name of the virus or malware but it was removed with avg free edition
funny thing is it didnt seem to affect anything else on the computer

Profile
 
Posted: 01 June 2008 11:32 AM   [ # 8 ]     [ Ignore ]   [ # 8 ]  
In The Club
Total Posts:  208
Joined  2008-05-26

I have never used this search.Microsoft really sucks at search ,sky is right.Why do you think it wanted to buy yahoo.I still might get it, you know.

Profile
 
‹‹ GPUs vs CPUs      [ Article ] Codec Headache ››