Tuesday July 7, 2009 5:24 pm
Sarah Palin Talks About Her Abrupt Departure
Wearing high waders and a T-shirt, former Governor Sarah Palin talked to CNN while sporting a ponytail. I believe the interview was meant to clarify her decision to abdicate her high-ranking political office, but it only served to raise more questions.
“I want to help Alaska in different venues, on a different level,” she said.
Read More 
| TV Guide
“I’m certainly not a quitter, I’m a fighter,” she explained as she stood near the water, making ready to embark on a family fishing trip.
“The best thing for Alaska is for me not to run again,” Palin declared, making vague references to “pretty tough” conditions and saying she was surrounded by a “political bloodsport.”
“I can’t see me being out of public service,” Palin hedged when asked directly about the possibility that she might run for the Presidency in 2012. During her interview, the ex-Gov made vague references to political attacks, ethics violations and even called herself a “lame duck.”
Just to remind you, this is the woman who was almost our Vice President.
- Related Tags:
- adslice, alaska, alaska governor, cnn, ex-governor, former governor sarah palin, governor, governor sarah palin, interview, presidency, sarah palin, sidefeatured, vice president, video, videos
Advertisement
Comments:
Advertisement
Advertisement
© Gear Live Media, LLC. 2007 – User-posted content, unless source is quoted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Public Domain License. Gear Live graphics, logos, designs, page headers, button icons, videos, articles, blogs, forums, scripts and other service names are the trademarks of Gear Live Inc.
Forum Discussion
View This Post
View Forum Thread
anarchy is against the government because of reasons like corruption, cofusion and pissing off other coutries its not a political party, if anything its the opposite of one
Reply to this: post
View This Post
View Forum Thread
yeah i think that its possible hilary could be a better president than bush i could never understand, almost everyone i know disliked bush before they voted who the hell voted for him?!?!?!?!
Reply to this: post
View This Post
View Forum Thread
i know, thats what i meant by against the government i meant against the idea of one in general
Reply to this: post
View This Post
View Forum Thread
i am neither either way whoever wins they lie to get there so really dont make no difference to me. jsut as long as bush is outta there thats all i care about.
Reply to this: post
View This Post
View Forum Thread
no, anarchy is not an official party if theres anarchy somewhere it just means theres no government
Reply to this: post
View This Post
View Forum Thread
Lol. Not against the government. It's FOR the lack of government. I don't believe that confusion and pissing off other countries is included with it though. And I voted for other so that should count. I wonder if anyone will go for feudal hierarchy... certainly not me XD
Reply to this: post
View This Post
View Forum Thread
"I rarely hear about this party in the US." ur kinda missing what im trying to say.... they arent a party, an anarchist country is like a more official way of saying they dont have a government
Reply to this: post
View This Post
View Forum Thread
[quote author="sharkhead7854" date="1212606073"]no, anarchy is not an official party if theres anarchy somewhere it just means theres no government[/quote] Do you know any specific countries that contain an anarchy? I rarely hear about this party in the US.
Reply to this: post
View This Post
View Forum Thread
Anarchy all the way. With the democratic (government type, not the party) polity we have right now, I think anarchy is the best. <_< At least there's no such thing as corruption.
Reply to this: post
View This Post
View Forum Thread
[quote author="SkyFuser" date="1212571587"]Anarchy all the way. With the democratic (government type, not the party) polity we have right now, I think anarchy is the best. <_< At least there's no such thing as corruption.[/quote] I have never heard of such thing in my life. What goals do they have? Are they more like Republicans or Democrats?
Reply to this: post